🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer sites. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.